Bargaining power has recently been subject to a great deal of attention. Allegations of bargaining power imbalances in the digital and supermarket industries have spurred calls for bargaining power to be reined in. In an editorial published in the current issue of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law, Luke Wainscoat, Zoe Odgers and Ashmit Vyas examine the economics of bargaining power, including the effects of that power and whether intervention is needed to prevent its use. Luke and Adrian discuss this in a short video – see below.
Their key findings are that:
The authors find that the ACCC appears to have become increasingly concerned with perceived bargaining power imbalances in cases such as the perishable agricultural goods inquiry, the collective bargaining authorisation at the Port of Newcastle and the News Media Bargaining Code. A review of those matters indicate an incomplete analysis of the effects of bargaining power on competition and consumers.
Given the benefits of bargaining power, the lack of evidence of any harms caused by that power and the importance of bargaining to the competitive process, the authors conclude that:
HoustonKemp is pleased to announce our recent submission to the consultation on revitalising the National Competition Policy…
The Federal Court has this week heard closing submissions by counsel for Apple in response to antitrust claims brought against…
Last night we celebrated our 10th anniversary with many of our wonderful clients and colleagues. We reflected on the changes…
Luke Wainscoat, Nick Twort and Andrew Brunt prepared a report on…